Am I Becoming Jaded with the NBA?

There’s nothing worse than a bunch of jaded old farts, and that’s a fact.

For the first time in nearly three years, I didn’t renew my NBA League Pass.

It wasn’t an easy decision to do.

I got the automatic re-payment this September on my credit card. Almost 200 dollars. Usually, I would be okay, almost excited with the payment. The start of the NBA season has been traditionally one of the more upbeat parts of the year for me: late October, Fall still in bloom, baseball winding down, and the promise of NBA games every night on my laptop thanks to NBA League Pass. Hell, this year I even had a TV with Bluetooth capability. If there was any year to enjoy the 2016-2017 NBA season, this was it.

But I couldn’t be okay with the 200 bucks this time around. Something in me just couldn’t pull the trigger. I put in my cancellation notice, got my refund and just like that my NBA League Pass was gone.

How could this happen? How could someone like me, who loves professional basketball (both NBA and Euroleague) as much as me not subscribe to one of the greatest online services in the history of the internet? How could I pass on Grant Napear Sacramento Kings broadcasts and random Charlotte Hornets-Milwaukee Bucks February contests on a weekday night? What would it be like not falling asleep to West Coast games that wouldn’t start until 9-10 p.m. in Kansas City?

The short answer: perhaps I have become a little jaded with the NBA after this off-season.

Now let me get into the long answer.

This NBA off-season broke me. I was excited for the increase in salary cap, hoping that either middle-level teams would be able to make that key off-season acquisition that would put them over the top, or teams would be able to keep their star-cores intact and build on a run to challenge the Golden State Warriors or Cleveland Cavaliers, who had faced off against each-other in back-to-back finals.

And then Kevin Durant signed with the Warriors.


This move brought up a bunch of mixed feelings. As stated on this blog before, I did not grow up a Kings fan. I grew up masochistically rooting for the Warriors.

Run TMC. Joe Smith. Chris Mills. Bob Sura. Adonal Foyle. Erick Dampier. Gilbert Arenas. J-Rich. Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy as “thunder and lightning”. Andris Biedrins. Don Nelson leading the helm. Monta Ellis. “We Believe.” The weird superhero mascot. The orange jerseys. Mikki Moore playing way more than he should. Eric Musselman getting one crazy good year and shitting the bed  the next. Dave Cowens looking frazzled every night. Keith Smart acting as head coach while Nelson nearly fell asleep in his plush chair. Former owner Chris Cohen screwing the team over every chance he got.

Hell. I loved the Warriors. But then the team changed. It started with the change in ownership and then the uniforms. Then Mark Jackson and his uber-conservative social comments. And then people started to jump on the bandwagon. And then they made the playoffs and started winning consistently. Steph Curry won back-to-back MVPs. Draymond Green became a ball-punching and small-ball 5 savant. They launched a ton of 3’s and pushed the pace under Steve Kerr. Bandwagon fans not only came on in droves, but became more insufferable each and every game.

I have always had a soft spot for the Warriors. My mother still considers herself a devout fan, following every game possible on TV or radio even though my parents still live in Sacramento and get mostly Kings broadcasts on CSN California (I tried giving her my League Pass password, but she is terrible with technology and gave up after she couldn’t figure out what app to download). I cheered for them hard throughout the past two seasons, even though I had turned to the Kings, changing my allegiance from the Blue and Gold to the Purple and Black (or white…or gray…whatever the hell their color scheme is nowadays). The last NBA Finals was crushing. I remember all the elation I felt after they made that 3-1 comeback against the OKC Thunder only to see those feelings sink to low depths I didn’t think possible after they lost Game 7 at home to LeBron and Kyrie and Kevin Love (unlike most, I am  not a big fan of Love; it mostly stems from following him in his high school days while I was a sophomore at Gonzaga where he was treated as the Pope of the State of Oregon during his high school years, only to result in him and his pompous father dumping on the Ducks in the recruiting process and going to UCLA…screw the Love’s). I couldn’t even talk about the Finals for weeks. The loss felt like a girlfriend I was about to ask to marry suddenly dumping me the day after I bought an engagement ring.

Yes, I didn’t consider myself a Warriors fans technically. But that Finals hurt.It hurt fucking bad because of my prior history cheering on the Warriors during their lowest of lows, only to see what should be one of their crowning moments in NBA history (setting the regular season win record and get a second-straight championship) get absolutely stomped on.

God I hate Cleveland. I hope the Cubs obliterate the Indians.

But my feeling should have faded eventually over the summer. There would be next season. Their core would come back stronger and motivated, and though I still would primarily cheer for the train wreck that was the Sacramento Kings, the Warriors would still garner my interest and my secondary League Pass watching (it was common for me to have a split screen when the Kings and Warriors played at the same time; god I loved that).

And then the Warriors pompous owner, who was busy talking to the media about how he and his organization “changed basketball” (he didn’t; people were taking three’s and running and gunning way before him; check Paul Westhead and Nelson), stepped in. He got rid of Harrison Barnes and Andrew Bogut and Festus Ezeli and Leandro Barbosa and Marreese “God he’s so weird looking and he can’t rebound for a big man, but I love him as a heat check dude” Speights.

And the Warriors somehow signed Kevin Durant.

Yeah I should have been happy for the Warriors. But I wasn’t.

The bandwagon won out. It was like how the Tea Party won with Donald Trump as the Republican nominee. The “old” Warriors were gone. The Warriors had now evolved into the Lakers and Heat in terms of they could get whoever they wanted now. The days of Arenas not wanting to sign in Golden State because they didn’t have money and he didn’t think they could win were a thing of the past. They no longer were the charming, plucky, underdogs represented by Curry and Klay Thompson and Green, guys who got passed over in the draft in favor of “sexier” prospects in the draft (sexy being Jonny Flynn).

The Warriors were able to acquire and pay for a former MVP, one of the Top 5 players in the league.

I can’t back a Warriors team like that. That’s not why I cheered for them, fell in love with them in the first place.

I can’t bare to watch a team with Durant in a Warriors uniform. It feels dirty, sacrilegious and traitorous to everything I invested in and experienced as a Warriors fan from 1997-2013.

Cheering the current version of the Warriors, who are now the new “Boston Three Party”, the “Decision” Heat and “Dwight-Nash-Kobe” Lakers (oh wait… they sucked…never mind) just feels like voting for Trump this November. And if I lost my second-favorite current NBA team, the team that made me get made fun of at Hunter’s Barbershop in Roseville throughout my high school years, then what’s the point of keeping my League Pass?

But losing one team isn’t that big a deal, right? I still got Boogie and the Kings. And they got the new arena. I’m sure those alone would be worth the annual 200 dollar fee.

Well…not exactly.

NBA: Atlanta Hawks at Sacramento Kings

I have pretty much cheered for the Kings since they changed ownership from the Maloofs to Vivek Ranadive. For starters, the Kings fans’ fight to keep the Kings from being pried by Chris Hansen and his Seattle group inspired me. It made me proud to be from Sacramento, which isn’t easy to do considering are just above Fresno and Bakersfield in terms of California city popularity. Sacramento doesn’t have much beyond the Kings and the Capital. So for Sacramento to fight the NBA and keep their team from being another Seattle or Vancouver was refreshing to see.

For a while, I loved what Ranadive aimed to do when he took over. He wanted to make the Kings a thinking-tank when it came to innovating the team on and off the court. He hired Pete D’Alessandro, a more business-type who seemed to be more concerned with manipulating the salary cap in creative ways than buying Raising Cane’s and playing pea-knuckle with free agents. Petey D did all kinds of cool, out-of-the-box thinking when it came to roster compilation and the draft (the Kings Grantland short documentary on them crowd-sourcing for the draft really solidified my allegiance to the Kings franchise). And him and Vivek seemed prime to be different. For a small-market team like the Kings, it was what they needed to do. The way I saw it, the Kings were on their way to becoming the Bill Beane “Moneyball” Oakland A’s of the NBA.

Unfortunately, the honeymoon didn’t last long with Kings fans. The city of Sacramento, unable to be satisfied after shit fell apart once Rick Adelman left town, grew impatient and quickly frustrated with the Kings’ “process.”

First, he fired Mike Malone, which in retrospect was a poor choice. Yes, maybe Malone didn’t want to play the breakneck pace that Vivek wanted, but Malone was a good coach. He has proven that in Denver, making the Nuggets the “Denver Internationals” with a fun, balanced-style that features all kinds of entertaining foreign players such as Nikola Jokic and Jusuf Nurkic and Danilo Gallinari. It would have been interesting if Malone was still the coach in Sacramento. I guarantee you they probably would have been in the playoff hunt longer last season.

But Malone really was the tip of the iceberg. Cousins failed to get along with coaches post-Malone, through a combination of his and the coaches’ fault. Vivek, unable to let go of his micro-managing ways and harboring the desire to compete with Joe Lacob and Robert Pera of the Grizzlies for title of “most obnoxious” owner, continued to meddle to the Kings’ detriment. He hired and fired or (didn’t fire sooner, as was the case with George Karl) coaches without reason. He brought in guys in the organization who were unprepared to work in a NBA front office (sorry Vlade). He let his biases negatively affect the Kings when it came to player acquisition, putting them back development wise year after year. (Stauskas!) Vivek basically represented all the negative collateral damage of the “new  brand” of NBA owner who had arrived in the league post 2010: meddlesome, wanting to be in the spotlight more than necessary.

And in that process, with the combination of Vivek’s inability to balance ego and appeasing fans, the Kings started to fade from the neat little “Moneyball” franchise to the typical, shitty, in no-man’s land NBA team. Petey D left. After setting scoring records in the D-League the past two years thanks to head coach David Arsenault Jr’s experimental system from Grinnell College, the Big Horns let go of Arsenault this off-season and seem to be content to revert to traditional, not to mention joyless, minor-league basketball. Speaking of up-tempo, Karl and his push-the-pace preference (the Kings led the league in pace last year) were kicked out of town for a more typical, grind-it-out style under new coach Dave Joerger. And that’s no offense to Joerger. He’s an excellent coach and I think he has the chance to do good things in Sacramento. It’s just that…he’s a typical NBA coach who will play a typical NBA style…and that’s disappointing considering I thought the Kings were going to be more than that with Vivek took over in 2013.

I know that’s weird to be disappointed about. But in all honesty, I loved the Kings last year. Yes, the chemistry was awful. Rajon Rondo and Rudy Gay needed to go. Cousins needed a new coach with less baggage. But holy fuck. The way they played. The way they scored (and gave up) points proved to be fun to watch night after night. For all the lackluster matador defense of Rondo and Cousins, you had Omri Casspi catching fire from beyond the arc and Quincy Acy going beast mode on the boards. The Kings weren’t good. They weren’t a playoff team. But they looked to be developing something special. Just a tweak from a coach who advocated that similar style, and perhaps they could be the Warriors-lite, with worse defense, but still as effective when it comes to getting buckets.

However, that seems to be gone. The Kings have resorted to aging and retread vets like Aaron Afflalo and Matt Barnes and Ty Lawson to build around Cousins. It sucks. This team reeks of a Brooklyn Nets team during the Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett years. It feels boring. It feels unlikable. (seriously, how can anyone like Barnes?) And it still feels like it’s going to suck. At least the last couple of years, the Kings were fun as they sucked.

So why pay to watch that? Why pay to watch Barnes bitch at other players in his typical “Respect me! I’m Matt Barnes! I don’t care if my wife left me for Derek Fisher!” way? Why watch a Kings team that feels like the late 2000’s/early 2010’s ones that appeared to be “dead men walking” when it came to staying in Sacramento?

200 bucks isn’t worth that. And that’s hard because I love Boogie. I love what he did this summer with the Olympic team. I still want to see him as a King for life.

Yet the rest of the Kings roster, organization and future? I just can’t back that.


I pretty much ordered League Pass to indulge in not only my passion for the NBA, but my two favorite teams: the Warriors and Kings. And do so from afar here in Kansas City, where there is no NBA team within driving distance. For a couple of years, I was able to happily enjoy those two franchises, albeit in different ways. However, this summer and off-season has just been miserable for me. I don’t feel optimistic about the future of either team, and in that pessimism, I have grown distant from not just the Warriors and Kings, but the NBA.

My twitter, which is pretty much a NBA news source, remains relatively unchecked and unused for days at a time, sometimes weeks.

I rarely listen to my NBA Ringer or Lowe Post podcasts. They were required listening for me on my daily commute to work not just during the season, but all year long.

I felt more unprepared and apathetic for my NBA Fantasy draft in comparison to years past. I am depending on Mirza Teletovic and Doug McDermott for threes.

In one summer, thanks to my two favorite teams’ off-seasons, I have not just grown more apathetic to the NBA, but perhaps cynical and jaded. I don’t believe I will be able to enjoy this year as much as I have the previous years post-2009, when I graduated from Gonzaga and switched from primarily following college basketball to the NBA.

NBA League Pass was the greatest thing to happen for me leisurely the past few years and now I will be without it. And I don’t feel bad or sad or frustrated or anything. I am just in “meh” mode, fuckified from a NBA off-season from hell for me personally and spiritually as a NBA fan.

Who knows though.

Maybe my jadedness will fade and I will rekindle my passion for drinking Miller High Life and watching multiple NBA games during the week by December.

League Pass goes down by fifty bucks around Christmas time.

It’s Time to Move on from Karl in Sacramento


At 30-46 this season, and 41-65 in his one-and-a-half season run so far as the head man of the Sacramento Kings, it is obvious that the Kings organization is in dire need of a change as they head into the Golden One Center in Downtown Sacramento next year. Yes, Karl has delivered on the “up-tempo” philosophy that majority shareholder Vivek Ranadive wanted when he fired Michael Malone early last season. The Kings rank No. 1 in the NBA in pace at 100 possessions per 48 minutes, and rank No. 3 in scoring offense at 106.9 ppg. That being said, Karl’s “philosophy” has come at a cost to other categories, as they rank last in scoring defense (109.1 points allowed per game), 27th in effective field goal percentage defense (52.2 percent allowed) and 21st in defensive rating (108.3 points allowed per 100 possessions). Furthermore, though the Kings score at a high rate, it hasn’t come in necessarily the most efficient manner, as the Kings rank 12th in offensive rating (106.1 points scored per 100 possessions) and 27th in turnover percentage (14.2 percent). Yes, the Kings have been entertaining on the court when it comes to generating points, but it hasn’t resulted in much improvement in the Win-Loss column, disappointing considering many Kings fans had hopes that they would compete for a playoff spot this season after big free agent acquisitions such as Rajon Rondo, Marco Belinelli and Kosta Koufos.

That being said, it’s not just the numbers and the on-court product that merit Karl being showed the door by Kings management. In fact, if we just based Karl’s tenure on what I listed above, I think most Kings fans would be okay with him coming back for a second full season in 2016-2017, especially considering these numbers are probably the best we have seen from a Kings coach in the Post-Rick Adelman era. Unfortunately, off the court, both in the locker room and the media, Karl has been an unmitigated disaster in his relationships with everyone in the organization, from players to assistant coaches to even front office members. Let’s take a look at the transgressions Karl has committed this year that warrant him being fired by season’s end at the very latest.

  • In the Summer off-season, rumors spread that George Karl called other teams to gauge Cousins’ value and see if teams were interested in negotiating a deal for the All-Star center and Kings franchise player. Karl did not have approval to do this of course from management or ownership or even Cousins himself. Things tipped to the point that Ranadive thought about firing Karl after news broke out about the incident and considered replacing him with John Calipari. Karl stayed however (after Cal expressed no interest in the Kings or any NBA job) and this led to the famous awkward handshake during Summer League between Boogie and Karl that was a forecast of the chaos that was about to occur in 2015-2016.
  • After scrapping their way to a 20-23 start with a brief period in the 8th spot in the Western Conference playoff race, the Kings lost eight of their next nine games before the All-Star break and rumors swirled wildly that the Kings were going to fire and have a new head coach after the All-Star break. However, due to ownership’s financial concerns, the Kings decided to keep Karl and “work with him” until to the end of the season at least. The decision hasn’t seemed to have much of an effect, as the Kings have been 8-15 after the All-Star break.
  • The Kings have displayed a lack of discipline on the court under Karl, as his lack of control as a coach has resulted in the Kings being one of the most T’d up teams in the league. The Kings are seventh in the league in total technical fouls, but the Kings are tied for third in player technicals (34) and are tied for first in coach technicals (8). Of course, there is a debate on how much of an effect this has in the W-L column. For example, the Clippers are in the playoff hunt despite being the most T’d up team in the league, but the Phoenix Suns are fourth in total technical fouls and rank near the bottom of the Western Conference. Furthermore, the Spurs are in last when it comes to technical fouls, but the third-to-last team are the Sixers, who are you know…going through the “process”. So it just goes to show that less or more technical fouls don’t necessarily directly relate to winning. That being said, Karl’s veteran presence was supposed to be an improvement over incumbent Ty Corbin, who was let go because many felt he had no control over the roster. Well…Karl, as evidenced by all the techs, hasn’t improve upon his predecessor, and he has cost a hell of a lot more money to boot.
  •  Karl has repeatedly buried younger players on this Kings roster in favor of veterans, even after the Kings played themselves out of playoff contention. Ben McLemore, Seth Curry (more on this in the next bullet point) and Willy Cauley-Stein have seen wild shifts in playing times, as they often have been bumped out of the rotation in favor of veterans like Marco Belinelli, Kosta Koufos and Quincy Acy (Acy and Koufos have been understandable, as Acy has earned more minutes due to effort and Koufos has been what Kings fans expected him to be: a defensive oriented player with an mediocre offensive game; Belinelli though has had one of his worst seasons ever though, as evidenced by his 9.5 PER and career-low 38.6 FG percentage). The only reason Curry and Cauley-Stein have been in more (and thus, been more productive) is due to injuries and suspensions by veterans on the team during this home stretch of the season. If Belinelli was healthy, I would bet that Karl would be having Curry (and to an extent McLemore, though he has had injury issues of his own) riding the bench, much to the chagrin of the fans and ownership, and to the detriment of the young King’s future and development.
  • Speaking of Curry, nobody has handled Curry’s rise in the past couple of weeks more poorly or immaturely than Karl. The way he has “backhandedly complimented” the first-year Kings player and brother of league MVP Stephen is either sadistic in an old-school Byron Scott “this is how I develop youngsters” way (which has proven to NOT be successful in any place he has coached, especially LA…which as a Kings fan, I’m not complaining about) or is a defense mechanism to deflect the real issue which is “why did he bury him on the bench for most of the season?” Despite Curry proving to be a valuable asset during this stretch run, replacing the injured Belinelli and McLemore in the starting lineup, Karl has refused to give the youngster much credit. Karl noted publicly to the media that Curry would only be in the league “a couple of more years” and also implied that Curry wouldn’t be seen as such an asset if he had a different last name. This has caused an uprising of sorts, as the “snake” emoji that has been synonymous with Karl’s description from former (and current) players reared its head again with Curry posting it on twitter. And furthermore, Cousins interrupted a Curry interview the day after Karl’s comments to make a jab at Karl’s “career length” comment about Curry. No matter what Karl’s true feelings are about Curry or other Kings players, Karl has showed an amazingly lack of tact when it comes to sharing his opinions with the media, which has caused inner locker room turmoil between players and the coaching staff.
  • And lastly, the coaching staff under Karl has been an utter disaster, as nobody seems to trust anyone on staff. This off-season, the Kings got some notoriety when they decided to hire Nancy Lieberman as an assistant this summer. While she is not the first (the Spurs beat the Kings to the punch by hiring Becky Hammon, who coached the Spurs to a Summer League title), it was a sign of some good progressive movement as an organization after years of stagnation under the Maloofs (mostly due to the fact that THEY DIDNT HAVE ANY MONEY). Unfortunately, the hire seemed to come from above Karl (most likely an ownership decision) and reports not only circulated that Karl exiled Lieberman from the coaching staff due to his suspicions that she was a confidante for Ranadive, but that inner coaching turmoil concerning her and the staff was a reason in the firing of Vance Walberg, who was one of Karl’s “hires” from his days in Denver.

As you can see, this list is comprehensive and ridiculous. Not even the poorest of NBA coaches could have compiled a list this extensive in a one-and-a-half year campaign, but Karl managed to do so. With Karl in charge, the Kings have been a “three ring circus” and he has not really done anything to mitigate or lessen the negative attention that has plagued the Kings all season long. I mean, just go to Deadspin and search “Sacramento Kings” and it’s crazy ridiculous the kind of articles that post up. While it’s nice that Sacramento, which usually ranks in “NBA Media Attention” circles somewhere between Milwaukee and Charlotte, has garnered more attention than usual this season, it would have been nice if the Kings were getting some attention in the media regarding a possible playoff run or Cousins’ turning into one of the better post players in the NBA rather than the tire fire that has been their organizational chemistry.

And what makes this all the worse is despite this utter cluster fuck this organization has been the past season, despite all this turmoil, bickering and lack of management, Karl is still sitting on the bench completely cool and without a care in the world. And that’s the nail in the coffin when it comes to Karl’s future: he doesn’t really give a shit about how this team performs or whether it is set up for long-term success. As long as Karl gets paid, he could care less what happens. I seriously doubt he does anything at practice but show up, have a seat on the bench while the team shoots around or assistants work one-on-one, open up to Aliene Voison’s column in the Sac Bee sports section while downing a medium Peet’s Iced Mocha, and snicker as she argues that Karl is more indispensable to this Kings’ organization than Boogie, a 2-time All-Star and a good candidate to be the starting center on Team USA this Summer.  Karl has not just produced a team that is ill-suited for his style (watch Cousins huff and puff down the court and you can understand why the Kings struggle defensively; the “high-octane” tempo is just not suited for him considering the minutes they need him to play), but foster a “McCarthey-esque” culture of paranoia within the locker room. He has conned ownership and fans into thinking he really cares about the Kings’ future when he doesn’t, just like he did in Denver, Milwaukee and Seattle in his previous head coaching stops. Ask any Nuggets, Bucks or Sonics fan or even former player. In no way shape or form are they clamoring for Karl to lead their teams again. (Well…I guess that really doesn’t count for Seattle since they no longer have a team…so they’ll look back fondly on that team of his simply because that’s all they got…you think they really loved the Bob Hill or Paul Westphal era?)

It’s about time the Sacramento organization and fanbase do the same with Karl. Yes, the organization will have to pay quite a bit to buy him out. Yes, it may result in putting him in a front office organization where he probably will just be sitting in the VIP box of the Golden One Center chewing a cigar and counting his money while he laughs as the Kings rebuild through the crater he left behind. And yes, it sucks that unlike in Seattle, Denver or Milwaukee, the Kings did not get at least one good “playoff” run or season during Karl’s tenure.

But, it’s time to move on. On March 30, the Kings signed Vlade Divac to an extension as GM and VP of Basketball Operations and there are reports that former Pacers executive David Morway will be joining him in making decisions in the front office. Vlade has a chance to rectify all the negative press he got from last off-season by making one simple decision: getting rid of Karl and finding a new head coach for this Kings organization.

Unlike Malone’s firing, there won’t be a lot of resistance or uproar about such a decision. If Vlade wants to justify his extension, relieving Karl of his duties after his disastrous one-and-a-half year stint will be the perfect way to start year two of his front office campaign. The Kings will be better in the long-run and will be able to truly build a roster that can compete long-term in the future, and not exist just to stroke the ego of a coach who is trying to milk wins during his last moments in the sun.

Let’s not be Indiana Jones here (snake reference for those who may not get it) and be afraid of something we know is bad for our organization, but won’t do anything about due to “technicalities” or “finances” or “fear of the unknown”. We’ll be all right post-Karl.

Bucks and Nuggets fans and players can attest to this. They know we’ll be “better off” with him “gone”.

Time for Change? A Look at the Future Value of the Kings’ Roster

What does the future look like for George Karl, Demarcus Cousins and the Sacramento Kings from here on out?
Wednesday’s 110-105 loss to the lowly Philadelphia 76ers, seemed to be a nail in the coffin for most Sacramento Kings fans’ optimism. After beating the Indiana Pacers on the road to go 12-17, many Kings fans envisioned a 3-game stretch against the Blazers and Sixers at home, and the Warriors in nearby Oakland, that would result in at least a 2-1 stretch, and a chance to be 14-18 and perhaps in the lead of the 8th spot by the start of the new year.

Instead, the Kings lost all 3 games (including a loss to the Blazers in which Portland was missing Damion Lilliard), and the results were uninspiring the least, as the Kings lacked cohesion, chemistry and discipline in what should have been a resume-boosting trio of games. Kings fans have already raised their pitchforks and gone on their soapboxes about the Kings’ inconsistent, disappointing and at times un-watchable 12-20 start this year, so I will not go into that debate much further. Rather, I want to take a look at the roster and analyze who is worth keeping and who is not going forward for the rest of this season and on.

Maybe the Kings will stick with the plan and the Kings in the current mold. Maybe change is already on its way (knowing Kings owner Vivek Ranadive, it’s probably the case). But the Kings are at a crossroads right now, and it’s worth looking into and seeing what direction the Kings could take to make this franchise competitive again, especially as they move into the Golden 1 Center next season.

The Inactive/End-of-the-Bench Guys

Duje Dukan, Eric Moreland, Caron Butler, Seth Curry, James Anderson

Dukan is pretty much a non-factor in this discussion, and is pretty much roster-filler for the Kings. Caron Butler, who was supposed to give some veteran leadership on and off the court to this team, has been such a non-factor that he’s been the subject of frequent trade rumors the past week or so. And though James Anderson is a scrappy player and a good story, his presence on this roster seems a bit superfluous. He probably needs to be on a team that would better utilize his calm, no-frills demeanor (I mean the Kings could…but we’re 32 games into the season and Anderson remains an “occasional” player at best).

The only two worth keeping perhaps are Moreland and Curry. Moreland has been a project of the Kings the past couple of seasons, as he has gotten quite familiar with I-80 East considering how many times he’s been called up and demoted to the Kings’ D-League team in Reno. In the D-League, he averaged a double-double, putting up a line of 13.7 ppg and 12.7 rpg in 7 career D-League games. But he hasn’t gotten much clock in the NBA, as he has appeared in only 8 games and has played 26 minutes total. With Cousins taking a majority of the minutes at the 5, George Karl preferring small-ball lineups, Willie Cauley Stein the post player of the future for the Kings (though his injury history isn’t a good sign), and a fractured foot that may cost him the year, it just doesn’t seem feasible to keep Moreland on for much longer. Sometimes, players are late bloomers, as Hassan Whiteside, a former Kings draft pick, has proven. I know the Kings and Kings fans do not want to give away another potential Whiteside player. But with the current makeup of this team, it doesn’t seem worth it to have Moreland in the Kings’ plans for the future, even if he does hold some talent and potential upside.

As for Curry, his future is a bit more debatable. Curry isn’t the playmaker that his brother is and never will be that kind of player. And Curry is more of an off-guard who could thrive in spot-up situations than the kind of shot-creator that brother Steph is. And Curry’s upside seems a bit limited at 25 years old. However, if Karl is going to be the coach of this team going forward, Curry would make a lot of sense for his fast-paced, shooting-heavy system (especially considering this team lacks consistent outside threats). He is young and he could find a valuable (not to mention affordable) role off the bench as shooter off the bench. He currently has a 3-pt FG percentage of 40.9 percent and he shot 46.7 percent on 334 attempts last year in the D-League with Erie, so he certainly has that capability to develop into a role player with the Kings.

The Veteran Bench Crew

Quincy Acy, Marco Belinelli, Kosta Koufos, Darren Collison, Omri Casspi

I like Acy personally as a player. He hustles, goes all out and his effort makes up for his lack of natural skill in all kinds of ways. He is basically a younger and slightly more skilled Reggie Evans, whom I also liked a lot from last year’s squad. However, Acy is the typical “struggles to find a place” big guy that the Kings have had a tendency to acquire the past few years (JJ Hickson, Carl Landry, Ryan Hollins, etc.). Acy may be a good team guy, and he probably deserves more clock than he gets, but he is pretty expendable to the Kings at this point, especially once Cauley-Stein gets healthy.

Belinelli and Collison also fall into the same boat, though they are more talented players and could net more in return than Acy. Belinelli was signed to give the Kings a veteran shooter who came from a winning pedigree (he previously played with the Spurs). However, he hasn’t been able to replicate his San Antonio days in Sacramento. And a lot of that makes sense. The Spurs are a team that thrives on ball movement and role-specificity, and the Kings under Karl have been far from that, as he allows his team to be more free-flowing for both good and bad. That is not a good fit for Belinelli, and it shows, as the lack of role definition is causing him to have one of the worst years of his career in Sacramento (his 32.7 percent 3-point percentage is the lowest of his career thus far, and his 10.3 PER is the second-lowest of his career, above only his rookie year where it was 8.2 and he was buried on the bench by Don Nelson, who typically does that to rookies).

As for Collison, he filled in admirably as a starter lasts season (not easy to do considering he was replacing fan favorite Isaiah Thomas) and has given some fire and depth to the Kings’ bench this season. Also, he has been a nice complement on the court to Rondo, as Collison can not only shoot a bit from the outside (to help mask Rondo’s shooting woes and open up the lanes for him to drive and create), but he can also be a good running mate for Rondo on the break, as his speed and playmaking ability (though not as strong as Rondo) give the Kings a viable second point guard who creates a lot of options in the full-court game. According to PER, his tenure with the Kings has been the strongest of Collison’s career (16.8) and he has maintained his ability to generate shots for others (23.9 assist rate) despite the presence of Rondo, while still being efficient with the ball (13.5 turnover rate, which is better than Rondo’s 24.7 rate, and one of the best rates of his career thus far; he’s also doing this despite their usage rates being quite similar, with Rondo’s 19.1 and Collison 20.4).

Collison has been a more positive story in Sacramento while Belinelli has been more of a disappointment. Despite their different skill sets and performances as Kings, they really share what should be the same fate: they ought to be explored for possible deals by the February trade deadline or by the end of the year. Collison has only one more year left on his contract, while Belinelli will have 2 more after this season, and they are both complementary players that can help a playoff team or a team on the cusp solidify a spot in the playoffs. But, they are not much more than role players, and the Kings need to fill in these spots with younger guys who have more upside and are a lot cheaper to boot.

Kosta Koufos may be in the same boat. But I hesitate to throw him in, because his contract his a bit longer and more expensive than Belinelli’s and Collison, and he is a good insurance policy for Cauley-Stein (whose health is worrisome) and Cousins (whatever the Kings should do with him). Unless you could straight up trade him for a young big man, Koufos probably merits a place in the Kings’ future, or at least until they are able to find another projectable young big to fill in the void for Boogie should he be gone (more on this later). And Koufos has proven to excel in Karl’s system (as he did in Denver) and after a down year offensively, he has picked it back (his PER is 15.3), though his defense hasn’t been as dominant as in years past with Memphis (that may have to do more with Memphis’ system and defensive-minded players, something the Kings lack, as per Karl).

And lastly, Casspi deserves to stay with this roster. His best years have come in Sacramento and he has proven to be a valuable fit to the chemistry of this team. He has been one of the few players to really mesh well with Cousins, and he provides good leadership and stability to a squad that lack those two characteristics tremendously. If there is such a thing as “untouchable”, Casspi is it in my mind. He’s only costing the Kings six million combined this year and next year. Keeping him should be a no-brainer for Vlade Divac and Kings management.

The Draft Picks

Willie Cauley-Stein and Ben McLemore

Cauley-Stein is an injury risk. He got hurt in college at Kentucky, and his injury this year isn’t promising, especially considering how injuries can derail post players in a hurry (Greg Oden, Joel Embiid, etc.). But, Cauley-Stein showed some promise in the beginning of the year, and he is the kind of defensive player who could help change the culture of the Kings organization. He has a tremendous skill set and athleticism that allows him to guard multiple players on the floor, and his abilities are certainly missed, especially as the Kings’ defensive effectiveness continues to plummet. WCS probably will never be more than an average offensive player (his 13.5 PER this year is a bit discouraging for a big, which PER tends to favor). That being said, I think he could have a Steven Adams kind of impact on this Kings team, and i think that is worth keeping around for in the Kings’ long-term future, or at least through the duration of his contract which could be as early as 2016-2017 or as late as 2018-2019 depending on whether the Kings pick up his option.

McLemore on the other end has really disappointed this season, especially after a promising start last year. Unlike Cauley-Stein, it seems as if McLemore’s future as a King is in doubt. He gets buried behind more veteran players in Karl’s rotation (specifically Belinelli, Casspi and even Collison, who plays more crucial minutes at the 2 with Rondo), and he hasn’t really developed into the kind of scorer scouts imagined he would be when the Kings drafted him No. 7 (and many thought that was a steal, as he was projected to go Top-3). He still shoots the 3-ball well (40 percent this year with 37.8 of his total shots 3-pointers), but the rest of his offensive game still leaves a lot to be desired (hence his 10.0 PER). And defensively, he constantly seems lost and gets taken advantage in switching situations (and he certainly doesn’t get much help from his teammates in this regard either).

I like McLemore more so than most (maybe it’s the Kansas connection for me). But, I don’t see the Kings going forward considering how far his stock with management and fans has dropped in Sacramento. He needs a change of scenery, and with his rookie contract up after next year, McLemore could be a good low-risk pickup for teams looking to add some perimeter scoring to their rosters.

The Veteran Stars

Rudy Gay and Rajon Rondo

The outlook on Rondo is not complicated. He needed Sacramento because they were the only team that would take a risk on him after his dysfunctional stint in Dallas, and his injury plagued last couple of years in Boston. Rondo did what Rondo needed to do to get himself back in the discussion as one of the more desirable point guards, and his value hasn’t been higher since his  pre-Brad Stevens Boston days. (And if you think about it, I would take Rondo over Derrick Rose at this point, something unthinkable a couple of years ago.) That being said, I do not think Rondo ever envisioned a long-term future with the Kings and I don’t think management did either, and it’s obvious on the court, as he does seem a bit more aloof and at arms-length with this current squad (I mean, they can’t even help him up correctly, just showing how not on the same page they are). Watching him make incredible dimes and show glimpses of the Rondo that tore up the Eastern Conference during the “Big 3” days of the Celtics has been a joy to watch in Sacramento, but his tenure as a King from Day 1 has always felt like it was just a temporary pleasure rather than a sign of things to come.

Gay on the other hand is a bit of a different story. It seemed the past couple of years that Rudy was starting to mature as a player and buck the bad mojo he got from his days in Memphis and Toronto. The common adage was that those teams “got better” when Gay left town because Rudy was the kind of efficiency-killing scorer that could put up great numbers, but didn’t help his team win on the court. In his first one and a half years in Sacramento, he seemed to be a welcome surprise. In 55 games in 2013-2014, he put up 20.1 ppg and 5.5 rpg and finished with a 19.6 PER and accumulated 4.5 win shares (compared to 0.3 in 18 games with Toronto that year). The next season was even better, as he averaged 21.1 ppg, 5.9 rpg, 3.7 apg in 68 games and bettered his PER to 19.7 and win shares to 6.1. For all those Gay-critics out there, Rudy did his part to demonstrate that he was capable of being the “star-like” player in Sacramento that many envisioned him to be back in Memphis and Toronto. Kings fans grew to love him, management rewarded him with an extension through 2016-2017 (with a player’s option in 2017-2018), and he even represented Team USA roster in the FIBA World Cup (though he was an alternate who was chosen after a bazillion others declined).

But this seasons unfortunately has been a regression to the performance that Memphis and Toronto fans warned Kings faithful about. His scoring has dropped to 17.5 ppg, his PER has dipped to 15.9 (barely above average), and his true shooting percentage has fallen 4.1 points from 55.6 percent to 51.5 percent this year. Rudy is no longer dominating in any regard, but seeming to settle as the efficiency-killing scorer who seems moreconcerned about impacting his numbers rather than his team’s standing in the win-loss column. This self-absorbed nature with numbers is not surprising considering the addition of Rondo has seemingly usurped Gay’s role as the No. 2 to Cousin’s alpha dog title. It seems like Gay has struggled to develop his role on this Kings team with Rondo taking his place, and because of that, he is getting less touches (his usage rate is down from 27 percent to 24 percent) and trying to do too much when he does have the ball to prove he still can be a Robin to Cousins’ Batman. Much to his and Kings fans’ chagrin, Rudy instead has gone from Robin to Alfred, only if Alfred was bad at keeping care of the house or had a tendency to spill the beans about Batman’s whereabouts every now and then.

Now the one argument you could make with Rudy is that Karl has gotten him to adjust his offensive shot selection, as he has made more of an effort to take more shots in more “effective” areas. Take a look at Rudy’s shot chart from a year ago:

Screenshot 2016-01-01 at 4.28.52 PM

Now let’s see how Gay has altered his shot selection in a full off-season under Karl:

Screenshot 2016-01-01 at 4.31.52 PM

As you can see, Rudy is relying less on the elbow mid-range shot (a staple shot of his, especially last season) and focusing more on the corner and elbow 3 pointers as well as finishing at the rim more. So, though Rudy has struggle to fit in amidst the addition of Rondo, and his percentages aren’t as good as a year ago, it could be that Rudy is simply growing through this shot adjustment (not a bad thing because him taking better shots will be better in the long run). Maybe he’ll get back to his old numbers and perhaps even surpass them as the season goes along and as he plays more under Karl. That is one argument that makes Rudy worth keeping around in Sacramento.

Despite this shot selection “improvement” though, the main issue with evaluating Rudy is that despite his talent and the flashes of brilliance he showed with the Kings prior to this season, the days seem to be dwindling for him as a King. As long as Rondo is on this team, he won’t be the kind of player that was so effective the past two years for Sacramento. At the same time, even if Rondo goes and Rudy becomes the focal point again (along with Cousins), will this Kings team be a playoff contender or the same kind of squad that hovered in the 28-34 wins range? The answer to that question seems to be closer to “no” than yes, especially considering the Kings were more talented than they were the past couple of years, and still don’t seem much better than a 28-34 wins squad.

And as talented as Rudy is, he doesn’t seem to be the kind of player that can be “the guy” for this Kings team, especially if Cousins leaves. He probably could not handle team’s best defenders, and he wouldn’t have the complementary talent to help ease the pressure off of him and help him succeed offensively (he always succeeded as a secondary threat remember in Sacramento). And thus, the Kings are stuck in this situation where having Rudy really is more damaging than good, but they probably won’t have a lot of options with him. He is a solid role player, maybe a bit better than the typical role player, but he can’t help a team get over the top and he can’t lead a team by himself. And to make matters worse, I cannot imagine Rudy’s stock is high, simply because NBA executives know about this label for Gay, and they know adding him would be a bigger risk than it is worth. Hence, that makes the decision to deal him so difficult because the Kings know they would be severely under-compensated in any transaction involving him.

It’ll be interesting to see what they do with 22. I think the Kings would be better off without him, but it’ll be interesting to see if the Kings will suffice getting the short end of the stick in order to change the scenery in Sacramento or if they will hold onto him knowing that they put a lot of money into him and they want to see their investment through, with the slight hope Rudy can be the Rudy of the past two years and somehow go against history and be more of a “star” player that can help the Kings over the top in year 4 or the tail end of year 3.

I know…that sounds like wishful thinking but don’t underestimate Vivek and this Kings management.

The Franchise Player and the Head Coach

Demarcus Cousins and George Karl

What do the Kings do with Boogie? Is it time to cut ties? Do they try another coach? Do they close their eyes and hope for the best.

Basically we have to come to an agreement to this central fact: Boogie and Karl cannot get along and are poisoning this team whether intentional or not.

So, that means either Cousins goes or Karl goes…and this is where things get dicey.

I believe the Kings should ship Cousins and stay with Karl through the duration of his contract.

/gets ready for eggs being pelted at him.

/gets hit in the head. Says “I’ve been shot!”

/wipes eggs off forehead.

Now the first thought in many Kings’ minds is this: why let Cousins go and stick with Karl? Shouldn’t it be vice versa?

This pains me to say because I love Boogie so much as a basketball fan. He has an incredible skill set. When he is amiable, he is one of the most charming players in the league and maybe in Kings history. To have a guy who can average 20-10 and be one of the most feared post players in the league isn’t an opportunity that is available every draft. I really believe Cousins’ is one of the league’s 10 best players in sheer talent, impact and long term value.

At the same time, there are times when places or situations just are not fits. We saw it in Philadelphia with Barkley and the Sixers. Webber had to go through two organizations (Golden State and Washington) before he really found his niche in Sacramento. Zach Randolph had failed stops in Portland, New York and the Clippers before he really was embraced by Memphis and established ‘Grit ‘n Grind’.

Yes, Cousins is a rare talent. But the Kings need to move on and cut the cord for the sake of their organization as well as for fans’ psyche. This relationship is akin to an unhappy marriage that was in dire need of divorce long ago. And furthermore, Cousins needs a change of scenery for his own sake as a player. The Kings have tried multiple coaches, different GMs and even a new ownership group and it’s the same issues popping up time and time again. The attitude. The lackluster defensive effort. The yelling at teammates. The ejections. The pissed off interviews post game. Cousins may truly develop into a major superstar in the league, capable of carrying his team into contention in the Patrick Ewing, Karl Malone or Hakeem Olajuwon mold, but he needs to be in a winning environment. He needs to be in an environment or around players that will call him out on his shit, and he needs a coach that will utilize his talents properly while still challenging him to grow as a player and a leader. I just cannot foresee that in Sacramento. He’s gotten away with too much, and the organization has let him down too much that he cannot trust them with anything and vice versa.

I do not know where Cousins will end up. However, if he cares about winning and his legacy, he will go to a team where there will be “true” veteran leadership. There needs to be an organization with a clear plan, and a coach that won’t be afraid to stand up to him, but keep things in house. I hope Cousins succeeds because he seems to be a really good person at the core (like I said, this guy has really had no issues off the court as a King). And furthermore, when he is on, he can be one of the most enjoyable throwback players in the league to witness. Just watch the highlights below and you can see what I mean. Hopefully, a new organization will give him more of the good (as evidenced in the highlights) and less of the bad and ugly that unfortunately has tainted his career in Sacramento overall.

And with Cousins days likely (and in my opinion should be) numbered, it only makes sense to see Karl’s true vision for this team. A lot of people say that the Kings should focus more on the half-court and slow it down and be a style that is more akin to the Memphis Grizzlies or 90’s NBA, which means getting rid of Karl. However, that is a style that only made sense with Cousins. Without a true big to build around, and Cauley-Stein more of a defensive-specialist, it makes no sense to fire Karl and try to build that style of play. There is a lot of dysfunction with this Kings team, but Karl has them playing well offensively: they are 3rd in the league in points scored and 19th in offensive rating (and doing this despite underwhelming performances and lack of chemistry). If Karl can really get the players he needs, the kind of quick, up-tempo savvy athletes that made his system work in Seattle, Milwaukee and Denver, then the Kings may be better sooner than people think.

And if people think the idea of Karl rectifying the ship without Cousins is a wishful fantasy remember this: After the 2010-2011 season, the Nuggets parted ways with Carmelo Anthony, whom the Nuggets got a big haul for which included no-name guys and a lot of draft picks and cap-clearing pieces. Two years later, the Nuggets were one of the best teams in basketball, despite not having a “star” player (yes, they lost to the Warriors in the first round, but if you look at the whole picture and the struggles of some key players, not to mention the injury to Danilo Gallinari prior to the playoffs, a lot went bad luck-wise for the Nuggets heading into that series, which Karl or anyone else couldn’t control). In my mind, Karl can do that again, especially considering the Kings seem to be a little tweak here and there from being a playoff team in a year or two. Just look at what the Nuggets did that season below and tell me Kings wouldn’t be excited for that in the new arena:

If Karl has more say in player personnel, and if the Kings can net good hauls for Rondo, Rudy (perhaps) and Boogie (and whoever else I said was expendable above), it is entirely plausible to think that Karl can have the Kings in the playoffs in the 6-8 range as a fast-paced team with a strong core of young talent as well veterans whom mesh well with Karl’s coaching philosophy. Vivek wants the Kings to play up-tempo. The Kings have thrived for the most part in such a system beyond Cousins and Gay (to a degree though on Rudy; let’s wait and see until the second half of the year). Why not give Karl a real shot at making this happen without the baggage that is preventing this from really seeing it through (i.e. Cousins)?

It will be interesting to see how things develop within this organization over the remainder of the season. Will Vivek finally give into what Karl has been harping for behind the scenes (trading Boogie)? Will Vlade finally re-tool this roster into a team that has a good long-term future and not just short-term one? And will Kings fans buy into Karl and let him do what he was hired to do (build a playoff team in the mold of his former Sonics, Bucks and Nuggets teams)?

They will all be questions that most likely will be answered before or by the February trade deadline. It will be fascinating to see what kind of Kings team will be hitting the floor when the Golden 1 Center opens its doors in 2016.

Worth the Risk on Rajon? Weighing Rondo and the Kings

Though Rondo struggled in Dallas, he could be a good fit at point for the Kings.
Though Rondo struggled in Dallas, he could be a good fit at point for the Kings.

It’s been a pretty busy hot-stove season for the Sacramento Kings. The biggest rumors and buzz has surrounded on Demarcus Cousins’ future in Sacramento. Some say he’s going to the Lakers. Some say George Karl tried to trade him. Some say that they are going to fire Karl and hire John Calipari from Kentucky. The drama is such a whirlwind, it’s really hard to determine what’s true and what’s worth reading and listening to. And in all honesty, the news with Cousins has been hammered to death in both the media and Twitter-sphere, so I am not going to really go into great detail on this issue.

(But for those who are interested, I think Cousins needs to remain in Sacramento. I understand they would like a ridiculous deal, and I know Karl has found success ditching the superstar for a tremendous package and flexibility in return (i.e. Denver when they traded Melo) but Cousins is such a rare talent in today’s NBA game. There just aren’t that many quality big men with the skills, talent and production of Cousins. Furthermore, Cousins genuinely seems to like being in Sacramento, and not only is that rare, it should also be a sign that the Kings should be doing whatever they can to please and complement their superstar down the road. If Cousins was open about his unhappiness being in Sacramento (ala Kevin Love, Melo, etc.), then I would be open to it, but since that is not the case, Boogie needs to stay.)

Instead, I want to look at some of the possibilities for the Kings with the Free Agency period about to begin. The biggest story in my mind is the possibility of Rajon Rondo coming to Sacramento and inheriting the Kings’ point guard position from Darren Collison, who’s coming off a solid, though injury-shortened season. Rudy Gay, who is friends with Rondo, seems to be the most outspoken supporter of bringing Rondo to Sacramento, per this tweet below from Marc Stein:

The chatter is interesting for a variety of reasons. First off, the star has really dimmed the past couple of seasons on Rondo. Once ranked at Top-5 point guard in the league 3-4 years ago, injury and lackluster play have made Rondo drop out of that discussion considerably (you could argue he’s not even a Top-15 PG right now). That was amplified last season after he was traded to Dallas in a stint that could be rightfully called an unmitigated disaster. Though his true shooting percentage (42.2 to 46 percent) and points per 36 minutes improved (9.4 to 11.6) in his move from Boston to Dallas, his assist rate fell dramatically (49.3 to 34 percent) and consequently so did his PER (15.4 to 12.4), offensive rating (95 to 94) and offensive win shares (he totaled minus-0.7 offensive win shares last year with Boston and Dallas).

But while the numbers show Rondo’s decline, it was his clash with Rick Carlisle that ultimately led to his undoing. Rondo struggled to co-exist with the Mavs’ head man, so much so that Rondo only played 2 playoff games and 37 total minutes. Even before the playoffs were over, Carlisle was adamant in Rondo’s future being over in Dallas. What was supposed to push the Mavs over the edge in the first round, ended up backfiring, as the Mavs with Rondo faded down the stretch, and didn’t stand much of a chance against the Rockets in the first round (they lost in 5 games).

As a Kings fan, my initial reaction to Rondo was “Do we really need a guy with issues considering how touch the situation is now currently?” But, as I thought about it, I basically came up with three reasons why Rondo wouldn’t be a bad idea in Sacramento next season.


Reason #1: He will be an affordable Free Agent solution considering his position.

Darren Collison did a fine job last season at point guard. However, the Kings second unit struggled immensely, and though Collison showed he could be a serviceable starting point guard, he probably would be better suited as a backup point who can keep the Kings competitive when their starters are off the floor. Collison just doesn’t really match up at a position that is incredibly deep right now, especially in the Western Conference. With that being said, the Kings need an upgrade at point, and their options right now look thin in free agency, as only Goran Dragic and Rondo seem like the only worthy unrestricted free agency options.

Dragic seems pretty unattainable. He’s going to command a massive payday, and it appears that Sacramento doesn’t seem the kind of destination for a player of Dragic’s caliber. As for Rondo, his value is considerably down right now, and it is totally plausible to see Sacramento acquire him much cheaper than initially expected a year ago, when everyone felt that Rondo was going to be the hot unrestricted free agent of this class. In fact, many people are thinking Rondo could sign a short 1-2 year deal that could be pretty reasonable for Sacramento, not to mention hold a lot of benefits. If Rondo does well, and the Kings still are out of contention, he could hold some trade value which can help stock the assets on the Kings roster. If he doesn’t do well, it would be easy to part with Rondo since he is on a limited deal. And if Rondo does well and helps push the Kings in contention? Well, then we can re-sign him to a bigger deal, especially in a couple of years when the cap is expected to rise.

Either way, Dragic or Rondo seem like the only plausible free agent options worth the starting point position and Rondo seems more realistic and affordable than Dragic.


Reason #2: He could be a good fit in George Karl’s system

Rondo is a pass-first point guard who can push the pace and set up his teammates. He’s not a good shooter (career 50.3 true shooting percentage), but he never really has been asked or wanted to be. Rondo is all about generating assists and points for his teammates and he’s carved out an All-Star career doing so (career 41.1 assist rate). Also, Rondo has demonstrated being a plus on defense, though injuries have set him back in that category the past couple of years.

So how would this fit with Karl and his system? Pretty well actually. In many ways, Rondo fits with the Kings much like Gary Payton fit with the Sonics under Karl. While Rondo is not the shooter that Payton was, he can get to the basket well like Payton and he generates offense for his teammates much like Payton did during the Sonics hey day. Also, Rondo is the kind of defender at the point that gives Karl a lot of options on the defensive end. Furthermore, Karl also found success with Andre Miller at the point in Denver and Sacramento, who was a lackluster outside shooter, but excellent at getting to the rim and creating offense (though Miller was more prone to score than Rondo).

Rondo may not fit for a lot of teams, especially with 3-pt shooting in demand from guards across the NBA (i.e. the Golden State model). However, Karl has a positive history with point guards with similar skill sets to Rondo, and that could be a key factor that could sway Rondo to choose Sacramento as his destination next season.


Reason #3: He will fit well with this roster and their personalities

Rondo is a touchy personality. He struggled to co-exist with the younger Celtics last season, and he didn’t do well with the established status-quo in Dallas either. Rondo also has had legendary spats with players in the past (one of the reasons he has not been on the USA National team in the past is due to his feud with Derrick Rose). Some people refer to Rondo as a malcontent, even though he doesn’t typically fit the bill of one (i.e. he’s not getting ejected from games, yelling at reporters or teammates, etc.).

But Rondo has seemed to get along with talented teammates. While there was some adjustment, he eventually fit in with the Big 3 in Boston and helped them be a title contender for about half a decade. If Rondo is on a winning team and with players who can score and finish the plays he creates, he can seem to co-exist just fine. Rondo and Gay already are friends, so that doesn’t seem to be an issue. The big question now is simply this: will he get along with Cousins?

Cousins can get on his teammates and already there are a lot of stories about him that demonstrate he hasn’t necessarily been the best influence on some of the younger players (the biggest example being Nik Stauskas, who just seems petrified of him on and off the court). But Cousins is competitive and recognizes and respect players that can help him win. Furthermore, Cousins had no issues with any players on the Team USA roster during last year’s FIBA World Cup in Madrid, which further goes to demonstrate that Cousins and Rondo would co-exist as long as Rondo brings his effective playmaking to Sacramento.

He’s friends with Rudy, will satisfy Boogie’s desire to win, and seems to also have the kind of eclectic personality that could mesh with rookie Willie Cauley-Stein. I don’t really foresee a lot of the personality issues that Rondo has in Boston and Dallas in Sacramento if the Kings sign him.


Overall Analysis on Rondo

It’s always tough to decipher what offers will be thrown at players in free agency. But, to the Kings’ benefit, Rondo’s stock is low. And thus, he could be an affordable upgrade at the point that won’t require the Kings to surrender any of their assets (unlike Eric Bledsoe, whom the Kings are interested in, but will most likely require the surrendering of a lot of Kings assets, be it picks or players). Rondo seems like he would fit in the kind of style, offensively and defensively, that George Karl will want to play, and I don’t see his personality conflicting with anybody on the Kings roster (even Boogie). If the option is affordable, and short-term, I would not be averse to seeing Vlade Divac and Kings management pulling the trigger on making Rondo a Sacramento King in 2015-2016.